Observing that the man behaved normally during his examination before the court, additional district judge Sunil Rana said,
"By no stretch of the imagination can it be said that the alleged mentally ill person is not in the capacity to manage himself and his affairs. Hence, this court is of the opinion that present petition is not maintainable under the Mental Health Act".
The woman told the court that she married the man in 2002 and lived with him in northeast Delhi till May 2011, after which she was forced by her in-laws to leave the house with her husband and minor son.
She said that, after her father-in-law's death, property belonging to the family came to her husband. She said he suffered from a "mental disorder and was incapable of making wise decisions and also needed medical treatment".
The woman sought to be appointed as her husband's guardian as she claimed her mother-in-law and brother-in-law wanted to usurp the property. The man's mother and brother, however, told the court that the man was living with them and did not suffer from any mental ailment and pleaded for the court to examine him. The court examined him twice but found he was behaving normally on both occasions.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Wife canât run âillâ manâs estate
Dengan url
http://sehatputihgigiku.blogspot.com/2014/04/wife-canat-run-ailla-manas-estate.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Wife canât run âillâ manâs estate
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Wife canât run âillâ manâs estate
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar